E-DAY FROM THE JUDGING COMMISSION POINT OF VIEW
We would like to take the opportunity here to
give our readers a peek under the hood of the
E-Day competition. Have you ever wondered
how individual winners and award-winning
models are chosen at an event of this
magnitude? In terms of the number of models
in the Czech Model Masters competition,
a part of E-Day, it is one of the largest,
perhaps even the most extensive, event in
our country.
Fairly and objectively evaluating over 1,200
models in 43 senior and 17 junior categories
is not an easy task at all. Moreover, it is
necessary to bear in mind the very short
period of time allocated to this phase of
E-Day. Due to the limited time available, this
task demands a higher number of evaluation
teams, and in addition to that, it is necessary
to set up the increased number of individual
teams in such a way as to ensure objectivity
and eliminate any conflicts of interest –
ie. avoiding cases where a judge is also
a competitor in a given category. You can't
simply judge (officially) your own model on
E-Day!
The work of the judges starts a few weeks
before the event itself, when it is necessary
to contact fellow modellers who will be
willing to participate in judging. A narrower
circle of judges and several substitutes will
then be formed from the wider circle of
those approached. For this year's edition, we
expected to divide it into approximately 12-15
judging committees.
After the model entry deadline on the day
of the competition itself, a short briefing of
the judging teams took place, where the
evaluation criteria and the time limitations
were explained. There was a breakup
into individual teams, which was already
known in advance, but on the spot we added
colleagues who, for example, could not
arrive in Milovice due to illness. Ultimately,
we judged the competition at full strength
of fifteen teams of three judges. Thanks to
this, it was possible to submit the results for
processing on time.
And how does the detailed evaluations
themselves take place? The E-day
competition part is evaluated in a socalled comparative method, which is
a simplified form of evaluation, where
the judges do not take the models in their
hands, but try to objectively assess the
model visually. However, even with such
a simplified evaluation format, it is necessary
for the commission to focus primarily on:
• Geometry
• Fidelity of work
• Level of detail
• Color execution
• Marking execution
• Realistic appearance
Assessing all these criteria is often very
difficult, almost to the point of impossible,
given the number of entries, but this is also
why colleagues who have enough experience
to know what and how to focus are invited
to be on these teams. Individual teams in
the competition category will determine
the ranking of the first three places and at
the same time will also select the theme
award-winning models in other places. The
top winning model, the Best of Show, is then
selected from the category winners.
This year's evaluation of the competition
part took place within the predetermined
time limit, without major contradictions and
perhaps to the satisfaction of the competitors
themselves.
On behalf of myself and the entire coordinating team, I would like to thank once
again all our colleagues who served as
judges during this year's E-Day event.
Jiří „von“ Votápek
Table – as an illustration tool - for ensuring no conflict of interest situations, compiled in a MS Excel spreadsheet. Highlighted are
the categories individual committees #1-#15 cannot judge because their members have a model in that category.
October 2023
Special E-Day
INFO Eduard
41