POSTAVENO
HISTORY
Bout One: First Out of the Pan
and Into the Fire
The remaining six Mustangs from the training
program of South Korean pilots with freshly
applied ROKAF markings left for Korea on July
2. In their cockpits this time were six Korean
pilots. As the originally trained Korean pilots
were not ready for combat, the most experienced ones arrived from Korea and hurriedly
made themselves familiarized with Mustang
within just a couple of days. It was far from ideal, as they flew just one or two training flights
with the aircraft they have never flown before.
The ability of these pilots to reach their destination safely raised some concerns. Also their
aircraft were not in the best shape as they were
serving as a tugs for the tow targets, which
was hard duty and also their maintenance was
somehow compromised… Anyway, the things
went well and all the Mustangs ladned safely at
Taegu, completing the Bout One gathering of ten
Mustangs. Ten American pilots of the unit were
ready to fly them in combat, while sixt Korean
pilots were to be gradually trained with some
ready to get into action immediately. (5
Combat missions were initiated next day already, where first and foremost, the unit CO, Major
Hess, excelled. He tirelessly flew several missions per day. Despite having combat experience gained in the Second World War, the six
Koreans didn’t possess full control of the reigns over their Mustangs. The biggest issues for
them were caused by the aircraft’s high wing
load, which tended to extract a certain tax from
its pilots. Colonel Lee Gun Suk, experienced
wartime pilot, who is even credited with up to
23 kills in some Korean sources (although this
is unlikely), couldn’t pull out of his dive after
attacking a North Korean tank. He crashed and
was killed…
The lack of proper training of the Korean pilots
also somewhat complicated their operations.
Taegu was crowded with transport aircraft,
and the Koreans usually flew out of Chinhae
At the end of the war, by June 27, 1953,
the ROKAF would have 118 aircraft,
including 78 F-51D Mustangs and 11,500
personnel. In all, 39 Korean pilots will
have accounted for one hundred sorties,
and seventeen would be killed in combat…
Why Mustangs?
photo: U.S. Air Force
After his return to Japan, MacArthur learned
that Australian Prime Minister Robert G. Menzies offered the services of No. 77 Squadron,
which fell under FEAF. This was good news, because it meant another thirty Mustangs ready
for action and transfer to the area within a few
short days.
Contrary to the more sophisticated jet powered aircraft, Mustangs
could operate from unprepared airstrips. They were able to provide
air support at low altitudes using a wide range of munitions.
Another advantage was their long range and endurance.
The F-51D became the only single engine piston powered
fighter bomber used by the USAF in the Korean War and
fulfilled similar missions to that of the Navy or Marines Corsairs (in the F4U-4, F4U-4B, F4U-5N, F4U-5NL,
F4U-5P and AU-1 versions). Also, among the initial suggestions was the use of the F-47 Thunderbolt, but that
was never realized. There were several reasons for this,
despite the robust and high-performing “Jug” seeming
like the perfect candidate for such an operations in Korea. One reason was that throughout the entire Air Force,
there was only a single training unit still flying this type,
and there was uncertainty surrounding the ability to put
July 2022
together enough aircraft for the required service. To top
it off, there were no sources of spare parts for the Thunderbolts in Japan, contrary to the situation surrounding
the Mustang. FEAF commander General Stratemeyer
pushed stubbornly and persistently for the F-47. USAF
Chief of Staff General Hoyt Vandenberg didn’t definitely
turn down the requests until May 4, 1951, almost a year
later! The reasons that Stratemeyer so yearned for the
F-47 stems from the fact that, as was confirmed, the
Mustang was first a fighter. That was its role in the Second World War. Mustangs certainly played the part of
a strafing machine without question, but they were not
the ideal weapon for that role. The cooling system and the
length of its coolant system piping meant that the Mustang was more vulnerable to small arms ground fire. The
Thunderbolt, with its air-cooled radial, would be more
suited to the types of conditions that low level ops generated, even with its complex turbocharger. Stratemeyer’s
opinion was certainly not a case of mere theorizing. The
vulnerability of the Mustang did extract a heavy toll on
its numbers. Some monthly losses of F-51Ds amounted
to over a half of aircraft lost. As an example, April, 1951,
anti-aircraft batteries brought down thirteen F-80s, two
Thunderjets and 25 Mustangs…
INFO Eduard
25