Editorial
This October, for the first time in my life, I attended the International Engineering Fair in Brno. My colleague Jakub Nademlejnský had arranged a meeting there with a potential supplier as we are looking to purchase new equipment to manufacture both our existing product line and some new items.
EDITORIAL
Good Day, Dear Friends, This October, for the first time in my life, I attended the International Engineering Fair in Brno. My colleague Jakub Nademlejnský had arranged a meeting there with a potential supplier as we are looking to purchase new equipment to manufacture both our existing product line and some new items. Given the specific nature of our production and our objectives, an off-theshelf, mass-produced machine won’t suffice. We seriously need a machine tailor made for what we need done. There is a strong chance this plan will succeed; we returned from the fair with two potential suppliers, and just recently, in early November, we received test samples of our intended products for our consideration from one of them. And they look quite promising. While at the fair, we also explored other halls to check out various machines and technologies. We concluded that, judging by what we saw, the Czech economy certainly doesn‘t resemble a mere ‘assembly plant’, a characterization often used by various economic commentators and supposed and definitely biased experts. Joining our group was Standa Archman, who, unlike Jakub and me, attends the engineering fair every year. This time, however, he was without his usual partner, Herbert Seifert, with whom he traditionally attended trade fairs and professional conferences. Herbert, known to everyone here as ‘Bertík’, retired in August after nearly thirty years with Eduard. For the last decade or so, he served as the head of our tool shop. Beyond managing it effectively, he played a major role in the gradual evolution and improvement of our plastic kits. Herbert was— and remains, even in retirement—an expert in machining utilizing CAM. His collaboration with Standa Archman was crucial from my perspective as their manager. Without them, our model kits would never have become what they are today. Together, they managed to reconcile
two distinct perspectives on the production of molds and the final molded parts: the designer’s vision and the machine’s execution—the process of translating a designer’s ideas and intentions into a tangible product. Given their different personalities, things could occasionally get a bit tense, yet they always found common ground and a way to move forward together. As a seasoned practitioner who values established standards and proven technological procedures, Bertík often acted as a balance to Standa’s innovative enthusiasm, and vice versa, keeping it within the bounds of technical feasibility. At the same time, however, he would actively seek out solutions to push those very boundaries further. Standa, for his part, knew how to integrate Bertík’s constraints with fresh ideas—recalculating and brilliantly synthesizing the two into new technological processes that continue to expand our manufacturing capabilities.
Bertík’s departure triggered some organizational changes within the tool shop, in the course of which Standa became the department’s chief technologist. This is not a new role for him, as he has long exerted a significant influence on our technological evolution as a whole. In his previous position as chief designer, he learned to lead a design team. While this meant he did less hands-on designing himself, he supervised the design departments, provided guidance, and occasionally refined specific design projects. Several projects, such as the Zero, Wildcat, P-40, and most recently the MiG-15, were developed in this manner. The primary difference now is that the responsibility for the technological setup of both design and production processes will rest solely with him. We also took advantage of our trip to Brno to clarify the path forward and determine how we will proceed with the design of the 1:48th scale Ju 87 Stuka project.
New releases for 2027
In addition to upcoming kits for which the designs are not yet complete, most notably the 1:32nd scale Spitfire Mk.VIII, the 1:48th scale Spitfire Mk.XII and Mk.XIV, the 1:32nd scale Fw 190D, and all versions of the 1:48th scale Ju 87 Stuka, we need to maintain a concentrated focus on finishing projects for which the designs are already complete. Foremost among these is the 1:48 scale MiG-15 project. The first release, the MiG-15 Royal Class boxing, is scheduled to hit the shelves in December, and we are working hard to ensure everything is ready on time to make it happen. While four molds for the MiG-15 are currently in operation, the remaining two are awaiting final completion and fine tuning. Although this is a December release, everything must actually be finished and molded by mid-November so that we can begin shipping the kits to those that ordered the kit and to retailers. Similarly, we need to have the 1:72nd scale Spitfire Mk.I ready for the ‘Spitfire Story: The Few’ Limited Edition kit, another December release. Everything for this is already complete; the Spitfire Mk.Ia version debuted as a Profipack release in October, and the only remaining component to finish was the mold, or rather, the mold insert, for the Spitfire Mk.I fuselage (the version featuring the original, flat-topped canopy). At the same time, we are currently working to ensure the timely shipment of the plastic parts for the 1:48th scale A-20G Havoc from China. They will be traveling by train, a journey fraught with pitfalls and dangers, not the least of which is because a significant portion of the route passes through Russia. We also have another shipment on the way from Asia: the plastic parts for an Academy 1/72 scale F-4J Phantom. These are being transported by sea, though that hardly means the route is any safer. At the moment, the ship should be
4
INFO Eduard
November 2026